Panel by panel

Twelve of the 24 panels have their own optimiser, so each one is measured on its own. Here they are on a photo of the frame, right now or over any period you choose.

28 September 2026

Right nowor a period:

The tilted frame seen from the lawn, photographed on 17 September 2026. Each panel carries what it produced over 28 September 2026.

Tint: energy per kilowatt peak, compared with the best of the twelve over this period.under 80 %80 to 90 %90 to 95 %95 to 99 %99 % and over

Energy produced by each optimised panel over the period, and how long each one was measured.
Panel	Technology	Peak power (Wp)	Energy (Wh)	Wh per kWp	Measured for
M1 Panel 1, monocrystalline	Monocrystalline	280	233	831	7.3 h
M2 Panel 2, monocrystalline	Monocrystalline	280	239	853	7.3 h
M3 Panel 3, monocrystalline	Monocrystalline	280	234	836	7.3 h
M4 Panel 4, monocrystalline	Monocrystalline	280	231	825	7.3 h
M5 Panel 5, monocrystalline	Monocrystalline	280	210	751	7.2 h
M6 Panel 6, monocrystalline	Monocrystalline	280	184	656	7.2 h
P1 Panel 1, polycrystalline	Polycrystalline	275	263	955	7.3 h
P2 Panel 2, polycrystalline	Polycrystalline	275	264	960	7.3 h
P3 Panel 3, polycrystalline	Polycrystalline	275	251	912	7.3 h
P4 Panel 4, polycrystalline	Polycrystalline	275	243	884	7.3 h
P5 Panel 5, polycrystalline	Polycrystalline	275	227	825	7.3 h
P6 Panel 6, polycrystalline	Polycrystalline	275	212	772	7.3 h
Vertical array 12 modules, 6 frames	Thin film CIGS	120 each	Not measured individually: these modules have no optimiser. Their total is on the live page, as array 3.

How even is each row

How much less the weakest panel of a row produces than the strongest, in percent of the strongest. This is a calculation made from the twelve measurements above, not a measurement of its own.

The six panels of a row see the same sky, so they should produce about the same share of their peak power. One that falls behind points to shade, dirt, snow or a fault. Over a period, a passing cloud no longer matters.

Upper row, monocrystalline

Strongest: M2, 853 Wh/kWp
Weakest: M6, 656 Wh/kWp
Difference (calculated): 23 % less

6 of the 6 panels of this row answered. The weakest, M6, produces 23 percent less than the strongest, M2 (656 Wh/kWp against 853 Wh/kWp). Over a period, a difference above about 5 percent deserves a look at that panel.

Lower row, polycrystalline

Strongest: P2, 960 Wh/kWp
Weakest: P6, 772 Wh/kWp
Difference (calculated): 20 % less

6 of the 6 panels of this row answered. The weakest, P6, produces 20 percent less than the strongest, P2 (772 Wh/kWp against 960 Wh/kWp). Over a period, a difference above about 5 percent deserves a look at that panel.

How to read these numbers

Direct current, before the inverter. The inverter loses a few percent, so the sum of these panels is more than the lab delivers. The real production is on the live page.
The vertical array is not shown. Its twelve modules have no optimiser, so they are only measured together, as array 3.
Read through Tigo. The optimisers report to the Tigo cloud and this site reads the values from there.

Each panel's history can be charted and downloaded on the data page. The three arrays are compared on key figures and records.